| Annual fee | $0 |
|---|---|
| Purchase APR | 21.99% |
| Cash advance APR | 22.99% |
| Balance transfer APR | 22.99% |
| Foreign conversion (FX) fee | 2.5% FX fee |
| Cash advance fee | 3% of the amount of the transaction, up to a maximum of $10 |
- $2 charge for copies of statements
- Credit balance fee: the lesser of $2 or the amount of the credit balance when applicable
| Category | Rate | Conditions | Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Tire and participating Triangle retailers | 4 % | Collect 4% back in CT Money on almost everything at Canadian Tire, Sport Chek, Mark's, L’Équipeur, Party City, Atmosphere, Pro Hockey Life, Sports Rousseau, Hockey Experts, L’Entrepôt du Hockey and participating Sports Experts. | — |
| Gas+ and Essence+ fuel | 5 cents/L | Collect 5¢ per litre back in CT Money at Gas+ and Essence+ locations. | — |
| Grocery stores | 1.5 % | Applies to the first $12,000 in annual spend at grocery stores; excludes Costco and Walmart. Product page states examples are qualifying grocery stores and detailed merchant coding rules may apply. | First $12,000 per calendar year |
| All other purchases | 0.5 % | Collect CT Money everywhere else you shop. | — |
| Min income (personal) | $80,000 |
|---|---|
| Min income (household) | $150,000 |
| Residency | Canada |
- No fee, no interest financing on equal monthly payments when you spend $150 or more on qualifying purchases at participating retailers.
- Exclusive bonus offers and the ability to earn more Canadian Tire Money with Triangle Bonus Days, Spend-and-Get events and weekly flyer offers.
- Online account servicing to view credit card and reward balances, access cardmember offers, enrol in e-statements and manage upcoming payments.
Disclosure note
We may earn a referral fee if you apply through this link (no extra cost).
Key Takeaways
- The Triangle Mastercard makes the most sense for people who already spend regularly at Canadian Tire and participating Triangle retailers.
- The card is much weaker as a travel or general-use rewards card because rewards are store-focused and foreign purchases add an extra fee.
- The grocery rate is useful, but it depends on merchant coding and only applies up to a yearly spending limit.
- The financing perk can be handy for planned purchases, but it should not be treated like a reason to overspend.
- Carrying a balance can wipe out much of the rewards value quickly, especially on cash-like transactions.
- The published income minimums are high for a no-fee store-focused card, so approval fit matters as much as rewards fit.
On This Page
Quick answers
Is the Triangle Mastercard worth it?
It can be worth it if you shop often at Canadian Tire and other participating Triangle retailers, want the $0 annual fee 1 card, and plan to redeem CT Money inside that retail ecosystem; it is much less compelling if you want flexible travel rewards, statement credits, or strong value from spending outside its best categories.
Does the Triangle Mastercard have an annual fee?
No. The annual fee of $0 per year.
What does the Triangle Mastercard earn on everyday spending?
It earns 4% back in CT Money at Canadian Tire and participating Triangle retailers 1, 5 cents per litre at Gas+ and Essence+ locations 1.5% at qualifying grocery stores on the first $12,000 per year 1% after that grocery cap 1, and 0.5% on other purchases 1.
Is the Triangle Mastercard good for travel?
Not really, because foreign purchases add a 2.5% foreign transaction fee 2, the rewards are mainly designed for Triangle retail redemption, and the card’s listed insurance is limited compared with travel-focused options.
Can you use CT Money like cash?
Sort of, but only inside the Triangle ecosystem: the issuer says $1 in CT Money equals $1 in free stuff when redeemed at participating Triangle retailers 1, so it behaves more like store value than flexible cash back.
How we verified this: We cross-checked key terms and consumer guidance against primary sources as of August 26, 2026.
RateLab review
The short version
The Triangle Mastercard is easy to misunderstand. At first glance, it looks like a general no-fee rewards card. In practice, it is better thought of as a store-centered household card with a useful grocery kicker, a decent gas perk for people who use Gas+ or Essence+, and a financing feature that matters only if you make planned purchases at the right retailers. For the right person, that can be genuinely useful. For the wrong person, it becomes a card that sits in the wallet and comes out only a few times a year.
That distinction matters because the card’s strongest value is concentrated. The 4% back in CT Money at Canadian Tire and participating Triangle retailers 1 is solid if those stores already fit your life. If you buy tires, tools, auto supplies, seasonal gear, sports equipment, workwear, or household odds and ends there anyway, the card can quietly return a meaningful amount over time. The problem is that this value is not very portable. Unlike plain cash back, CT Money works best when you are happy to keep spending within the same network of stores.
Verification note
We reviewed primary sources and refreshed the links for this section as of August 26, 2026.
Who this card is actually for
This card fits a specific type of Canadian shopper. The clearest fit is a household that already treats Canadian Tire and its partner retailers as regular stops, not occasional stops. Think of someone who buys winter tires, garage and backyard items, sports gear for kids, workwear, fitness gear, camping supplies, and seasonal household basics in the same ecosystem. In that setup, CT Money stops being a novelty and starts feeling like a recurring discount on spending you would do anyway.
It can also work for people who want to avoid annual fees but still want a card with a few practical extras. The equal monthly payment perk on qualifying purchases of $150 or more 1 can be attractive when used for known, necessary spending. Buying a set of tires, replacing a barbecue, or picking up an appliance accessory is different from using financing to justify impulse purchases. When used carefully, the feature can improve cash flow without adding interest on those qualifying plans.
There is another audience that may like this card: people who hate complicated travel programs. CT Money is simple. You earn it, you see it, and you use it for goods inside the participating network. There is no award chart, no flight search, and no point transfer decision. Simplicity has value, especially for people who know they will never bother optimizing airline or hotel redemptions.
That said, the fit is narrower than the no-fee label suggests. The published income minimums are high: personal income of $80,000 1 or household income of $150,000 1. That is a surprisingly demanding entry bar for a store-centered card. So even if the reward structure sounds appealing, not every applicant will be an obvious fit on eligibility alone.
Who should skip it
You should probably skip this card if you want flexible rewards that can be used for statement credits, travel bookings across providers, or easy cash redemption into your bank account. You should also skip it if you travel often outside Canada, shop online in foreign currencies, or want strong travel insurance. The 2.5% foreign transaction fee 2 puts it at a disadvantage for travel and cross-border shopping, and the card’s listed insurance is limited to extended warranty 1.
It is also not a strong fit for anyone who regularly carries a balance. The standard 21.99% outside Q 2, while cash advances and balance transfers are 22.99% outside Q 2. In Q, the published rate is 21.99% for all charges 2. Those are normal-to-high mainstream card rates, not cheap borrowing tools. If you revolve balances, the rewards you earn are usually too small to offset the interest you pay.
Finally, skip it if your spending is spread broadly across categories and merchants. A general cash back card with simpler redemption may feel less exciting on paper but more useful in daily life. Many people overvalue the headline rate at partner stores and undervalue the convenience of being able to cash out anywhere.
Best use case
The cleanest way to use this card is as a targeted shopping tool: keep it for Triangle stores, qualifying groceries, and Gas+ or Essence+ fills, then use a different everyday card when you want more flexible rewards or stronger travel value.
The real tradeoffs in plain English
The reward structure is both the card’s strength and its weakness. On the strong side, 4% back in CT Money 1 is easy to understand and meaningful when you are already buying from participating retailers. The grocery rate of 1.5% on the first $12,000 annually 1 is also useful, especially for households that want a no-fee Mastercard because Costco does not accept Visa credit cards in-store, and because Mastercard can be useful where Amex acceptance is uneven. But the grocery multiplier depends on merchant code 5411 and specifically excludes Walmart, Walmart Superstore, and Costco from that higher grocery treatment 1. That is a very practical limitation, not a fine-print footnote you can ignore.
The all-other-purchases rate of 0.5% 1 is where the card starts to feel less competitive. If you use this as your only card, a large part of your everyday spending earns at a fairly modest rate, and the redemption value is still locked to Triangle retailers. That combination matters. A modest base rate can still be acceptable when rewards are flexible cash back. It feels weaker when the reward is store value.
Then there is the financing perk. Equal monthly payments with no fee and no interest on qualifying purchases of $150 or more 1 sounds excellent, and for disciplined users it can be. But it is a perk that works only when the purchase was necessary in the first place, the monthly payment fits comfortably in your budget, and you understand which transactions qualify. Used casually, financing can create the illusion that an item is affordable simply because the monthly amount looks small.
Another tradeoff is the card’s identity. This is not really a lifestyle rewards card. It is a retail utility card. That is not a criticism. Plenty of households are better served by utility than by aspiration. But you should judge it against what it is, not what it resembles in a wallet comparison chart.
Redemption reality: how people actually use CT Money
Redemption is simple, but the simplicity comes with a boundary. The issuer says $1 in CT Money equals $1 in free stuff at participating Triangle retailers 1. That means there is no confusing conversion chart. For many users, that is refreshing. You do not have to guess whether your points are worth less on merchandise than on travel. The value is laid out directly.
The everyday reality, though, is that redemption is only as good as your willingness to keep shopping in that ecosystem. If you are already buying from Canadian Tire, Sport Chek, Mark’s, Atmosphere, Party City, or the other participating stores, redeeming is easy and friction is low. If you only visit once or twice a year, the balance can sit there and feel less useful than ordinary cash back.
There is also a psychological gotcha here. Because CT Money is framed as store value, people sometimes spend it faster or less carefully than they would spend actual cash. That is common with store-based reward programs. A shopper who would never drive across town to buy a nonessential item with cash may happily do it to use accumulated store rewards. That can turn a good program into a weak one without any change in the official rules.
Redemption reality
CT Money is easy to understand, but it is not universal cash back. The right question is not “What is the rate?” but “Will I reliably redeem inside this store network without changing my spending habits?”
What to watch most closely
The first thing to watch is foreign spending. The card charges a 2.5% foreign transaction fee 2. On top of that, foreign purchases are first converted at the network or issuer’s applicable exchange process, and then the extra fee is added by the card issuer 3. That means the card is not a great choice for travel, foreign websites, or recurring subscriptions billed in U.S. dollars.
Watch for DCC at checkout
When paying abroad, always choose to be charged in the local currency, not Canadian dollars. Dynamic currency conversion can add a poor exchange rate before your card’s own foreign transaction charge is applied 5.
The second thing to watch is cash-like transactions. The card terms say that outside Q, cash transactions and related fees include cash advances, balance transfers, convenience cheques, money transfers, purchase of travellers cheques, and gambling transactions, and those are charged at 22.99% 2. Many people still assume that only ATM withdrawals count as cash advances. That is not how cards usually work. A seemingly ordinary transaction can be treated as cash-like depending on merchant type and processing.
The third thing to watch is the grocery category. The 1.5% grocery earn rate applies only to merchants coded under Mastercard category 5411, only for the first $12,000 per year, and excludes Walmart, Walmart Superstore, and Costco 1. This is a classic case where advertised category rewards can feel stronger than they are in real life. If your biggest grocery spend is at a superstore that does not qualify, your actual return will be lower than expected.
The fourth thing is interest timing. The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada explains that your statement date and payment due date are not the same thing, and interest can apply quickly if you do not pay the full statement balance on time 4. For a rewards card with modest base earn, paying interest even once can cancel a surprising amount of reward value.
Verification note: We checked official guidance for this point as of April 5, 2026.
Insurance and protection: enough, but not a selling point
As of our last review, the listed insurance highlight here is extended warranty 1. That is useful, especially on tools, electronics, and gear bought from stores where this card is likely to be used. But it is not a reason by itself to choose the card over broader competitors. There is no travel-first protection story here, and there is not enough listed coverage depth to make insurance a central buying reason.
That does not mean the protection is worthless. It means you should frame it correctly. Extended warranty is a nice supporting feature on a shopping-focused card. It is not a substitute for the bigger package some people expect from travel or premium cash back products.
Comparable alternatives and how to choose
The most direct alternative is the Triangle World Mastercard. The logic is simple: if you like the Triangle system but want stronger card-family benefits and can qualify, that is the natural place to compare next. The next step up is the Triangle World Elite Mastercard, which may make sense for households that are deeply committed to the Triangle ecosystem and want more built-in coverage and card perks.
Outside the Triangle family, the real comparison is usually against two generic types of cards. One is a no-fee cash back Mastercard from a bank, which often trades store-specific upside for easier redemption. The other is a true travel-focused no-fee or low-fee card that either reduces foreign costs or gives rewards that are more flexible when used outside a retailer network.
How should you choose? Pick this Triangle Mastercard when your spending naturally clusters at Triangle retailers and you know you will redeem regularly there. Move up within the Triangle family when you want more coverage or stronger family-specific value. Choose a plain cash back Mastercard when simplicity and flexible redemption matter more than store-specific perks. Choose a no-FX or travel-focused alternative when foreign purchases, trips, or travel insurance matter more than retail rewards.
A short decision guide
If you already shop at Canadian Tire and partner stores, want a no-fee card, and like straightforward store-value rewards, this card can make sense. If you mainly want one card for everything, there are better all-purpose choices. If you travel often or buy in foreign currencies, skip it. If the equal monthly payment feature would help you manage planned household purchases without pushing you to overspend, that perk may tip the card from “fine” to “worth having.” If you are unlikely to redeem CT Money often, do not let the headline earn rates distract you from the real issue: unused rewards are low-value rewards.
The final verdict is simple. The Triangle Mastercard is a useful specialist, not a universal winner. Use it for what it is good at, and it can be a smart addition. Expect it to be your best card for every situation, and it will disappoint.
Quick tip
Before carrying a balance for “just a month or two,” estimate the interest on the average balance, then compare it with the CT Money you expect to earn. In many cases, one month of interest at a standard rewards-card rate can wipe out a large part of a year’s everyday rewards on moderate spending.
What we checked in practice
For this review, we approached the Triangle Mastercard like an editorial checklist rather than a feature sheet. The goal was to see where the card feels strong in everyday use, where category promises can break down, and where shoppers are most likely to misunderstand the fine print.
- Application fit: We checked the published income minimums because they are unusually high for a no-fee retail-focused card, and that affects whether the card is realistic for the shopper it is marketed to.
- Reward path: We reviewed how CT Money is earned and redeemed to see whether the value is easy to access or likely to sit unused for people who only shop occasionally in the Triangle network.
- Merchant-category caveats: We paid close attention to the grocery category because the higher rate depends on Mastercard merchant code 5411 and excludes some major stores even if shoppers think of them as grocery destinations.
- Retail concentration: We looked at whether the best value depends on Canadian Tire ecosystem shopping rather than broad day-to-day spending, because that changes how the card should be used in a wallet.
- Cash-like transaction risk: We checked the legal terms for balance transfers, money transfers, convenience cheques, gambling transactions, and similar items that can be priced like cash transactions rather than normal purchases.
- Foreign purchase friction: We reviewed the foreign transaction fee and the extra cost risk from dynamic currency conversion because these two charges are still commonly confused by cardholders.
- Financing feature limits: We looked at the equal monthly payment perk as a budgeting tool, not just a sales hook, to judge when it helps and when it invites spending that would not have happened otherwise.
- Acceptance realities: We always compare everyday cards against Amex alternatives because acceptance can change the true value of a points card; in this case, Mastercard acceptance is broad, so the bigger issue is not acceptance but whether the earn structure is compelling enough.
- Protection depth: We reviewed the listed protection features to see whether insurance meaningfully changes the decision or simply acts as a minor extra.
The result is why this review sounds more cautious than a promotional summary. There is nothing wrong with the card, but most of its value depends on spending patterns that are narrower than the headline suggests.
Common mistakes we see
Most mistakes with the Triangle Mastercard are not dramatic. They are ordinary misunderstandings that slowly reduce the card’s value. The most common one is using it like a general everyday rewards card instead of a targeted retail card. That sounds small, but it changes the outcome a lot.
1) Treating the card like a universal cash back card
People often see a no-fee card and assume it should be used everywhere. The problem is that the all-other-purchases rate is 0.5% 1, while the best value is concentrated at Triangle retailers and a capped grocery category. If most of your spend is outside those areas, you may end up doing a lot of spending for fairly modest store-based rewards.
- Use this card most aggressively where it is strongest, not where it is merely acceptable.
- If your biggest monthly bills are not in its best categories, compare the total reward outcome instead of the headline rate.
- If you want one-card simplicity, prioritize redemption flexibility as much as earn rate.
2) Confusing purchase APR, cash advance APR, and balance transfer APR
Outside Q, the standard 21.99% 2, while cash advances and balance transfers are 22.99% 2. In Q, the published rate is 21.99% for all charges 2. That matters because many cardholders still assume a balance transfer is a special cheaper rate unless they are told otherwise. On this card, you should not assume that. Read the rate disclosure for your province and your specific approval terms.
- If the transaction is not a standard purchase, do not assume it is priced the same way.
- If you are in Q, check the province-specific disclosure carefully.
- If you are offered a different rate than the standard card, judge the card based on the approved terms, not the marketing headline.
3) Missing the difference between statement date and due date
This is one of the most common credit-card mistakes across Canada. The FCAC explains that your statement date shows when the bill is generated, and the due date is when payment must arrive to avoid interest on eligible balances 4. Some people see a fresh statement, make a partial payment, and assume they are safe because they “paid something.” That is not how rewards math works. With a card like this, partial payment can leave you paying interest that outweighs the value of the rewards you earned.
- If you want the full value of a rewards card, aim to pay the full statement balance, not just the minimum.
- If cash flow is tight, know the due date before you spend, not after.
- If you are using an equal monthly payment plan, track that plan separately from ordinary revolving balance behavior.
4) Falling into the minimum payment trap
Minimum payments keep the account current, but they are not a good strategy for a rewards card. A small minimum can make a large balance feel manageable while interest keeps accumulating. This is especially risky on cards with normal mainstream APRs, because the reward rate on everyday spending is nowhere near high enough to offset prolonged interest.
- If you can only afford the minimum regularly, treat that as a warning sign that the card should not be used for optional purchases.
- If you carried a balance last month, calculate whether new spending belongs on a debit card or a lower-cost borrowing option instead.
- If the card is being kept mainly for store rewards, do not let it become a borrowing tool by accident.
5) Assuming every grocery store qualifies for the top grocery rate
The grocery multiplier applies only where the merchant codes properly under Mastercard category 5411, only for the first $12,000 per year, and excludes Walmart, Walmart Superstore, and Costco 1. This is one of the biggest real-world gaps between marketing and lived experience. People spend where they think they are buying groceries, but card networks reward where merchants are coded to fall.
- If a store does not code the way you expect, the earn rate can drop without warning.
- If your household shops heavily at excluded stores, do not assume the grocery headline applies to you.
- If you are near the annual cap, remember that the return changes after it.
6) Ignoring FX costs and DCC when travelling
Two separate charges can hit foreign purchases. First, the transaction is converted using the applicable network or issuer conversion process 3. Then the card’s 2.5% foreign transaction fee is added 2. If you accept dynamic currency conversion at the terminal, you may also get a worse rate from the merchant side 5. That is why this card is not a great travel choice.
- If asked whether you want to pay in Canadian dollars abroad, say no.
- If you shop on foreign websites, check the billing currency before checkout.
- If foreign spending is common for you, compare this card against a true no-FX alternative.
7) Overestimating insurance
Some shoppers assume every mainstream Mastercard comes with a deep bundle of protections. Here, the listed coverage highlight is extended warranty 1. That is useful, but it is not broad travel or lifestyle protection. If you need rental car, medical, trip interruption, or purchase protection depth, confirm the actual coverage list and wording before relying on it.
8) Applying too often without a plan
Card applications can create hard inquiries and may affect borrowing plans, especially if you are about to seek a mortgage or other major credit product. Even if the Triangle Mastercard looks attractive for one retail perk, that does not mean it is worth a poorly timed application. Apply because the card fits your spending, not because a checkout prompt or limited-time banner nudged you into it.
Verification note
We reviewed primary sources and refreshed the links for this section as of August 26, 2026.
What we check when comparing cards
When we compare cards like the Triangle Mastercard, we try to ignore the excitement of headline earn rates and focus on what the average household will actually experience over a year. That means looking at how rewards are earned, how easy they are to redeem, what it costs to carry a balance, how foreign purchases are handled, and whether key perks are broad or narrow.
1) We compare real spending patterns, not idealized ones
A 4% earn rate 1 looks strong, but it only matters on spending that actually occurs in the qualifying ecosystem. So the first question is simple: where does the household really spend? If the answer is “mostly not there,” then the rate matters less than it appears. With Triangle, the big question is whether you naturally spend enough at Triangle retailers, Gas+ or Essence+, and qualifying grocery merchants to justify keeping the card active.
2) We do apples-to-apples reward math
A store-value reward is not the same as flexible cash. That does not automatically make it worse, but it means we do not compare it carelessly against straight cash back. We ask whether the reward can be used soon, locally, and without changing behavior. If a shopper must wait for a particular store trip or buy something they would not otherwise buy, the theoretical value and practical value are not identical.
We apply the same logic to category caps. The grocery rate sounds better when you read the top line than when you model what happens after the first $12,000 per year 1. Caps are not bad by themselves. They just need to be included honestly in the comparison.
3) We include the cost side, not just the reward side
A rewards card can be a poor choice if the cost side is ignored. That means checking annual fee, foreign transaction charges, purchase APR, cash advance pricing, and the way balance transfers are actually treated. Because the Triangle Mastercard has the $0 annual fee 1, the breakeven question is not about fee recovery. It is about opportunity cost: would your same spending earn more useful rewards elsewhere, or would a competing card better fit your needs for travel, flexibility, or insurance?
We also check whether the card punishes common mistakes harshly. A foreign transaction fee of 2.5% 2 matters a lot more to a frequent traveller than to a shopper who never leaves domestic billing. Likewise, a standard 21.99% outside Q 2 matters greatly if the shopper sometimes carries balances. Rewards should never be evaluated in a vacuum.
4) We look for redemption friction
Redemption friction can be subtle. Some cards make you wait for thresholds. Some restrict the best redemptions to travel portals. Some give you value only at specific retailers. Triangle is easy to understand, but its friction is ecosystem friction: you need to want goods from participating stores often enough for CT Money to feel nearly as good as cash. That is a very different kind of friction from a travel portal, but it is still real.
5) We check exclusions and category coding traps
This is where many reviews get too shallow. Grocery categories, gas categories, recurring bill categories, and online merchant categories can all depend on how the merchant is coded by the network. We therefore pay attention to the exact conditions, especially when major chains are excluded or when a category has a dollar cap. With this card, the grocery exclusions and cap are essential details, not side notes.
6) We ask what role the card should play in a wallet
Not every card needs to be an only card. Some are best as specialists. Triangle is a strong candidate for specialist status. It can be the right card for Triangle retail shopping and some category spend, while another card handles travel, foreign purchases, or general everyday spending. When a card is evaluated in the right role, the decision becomes clearer and less emotional.
That is the main framework we use here: fit over hype, redemption reality over marketing, and cost awareness over headline rewards. By that standard, the Triangle Mastercard can be a smart tool, but only when it is matched to the right spending pattern.
Verification note: We checked official guidance for this point as of April 5, 2026.
FAQs
Is the Triangle Mastercard hard to qualify for?
It can be stricter than many people expect because the published minimum income is $80,000 personal 1 or $150,000 household 1, which is relatively high for a no-fee retail-focused card.
Does the Triangle Mastercard charge foreign transaction fees?
Yes, the card charges a 2.5% foreign transaction fee 2, so it is usually not the best choice for travel or purchases billed in foreign currencies.
Can I redeem CT Money as a statement credit?
The core redemption described by the issuer is store redemption, where $1 in CT Money equals $1 in free stuff at participating Triangle retailers 1, so this program should be viewed mainly as retail value rather than open-ended statement-credit cash back.
Is the balance transfer rate lower than the purchase rate?
Outside Q, no: the published standard 21.99% 2 and the 22.99% 2, while in Q the issuer says all charges are 21.99% 2.
Does the Triangle Mastercard have travel insurance?
Based on the listed card details we reviewed, the highlighted coverage is extended warranty 1, so this is not a card you would normally choose for a strong travel-insurance package.
What happens if my grocery store does not code the way I expect?
If the merchant does not process under Mastercard grocery merchant code 5411, the higher grocery earn rate may not apply, which is why category-coding caveats matter as much as the advertised reward percentage 1.
Editorial standards
Plain-English, fact-checked, and updated as of August 26, 2026.
What changed (refresh)
- Last updated: August 26, 2026
- Updated terms, examples, and sources where needed.
What we verified (and what can change fast)
- Verified: Key consumer concepts and any stated terms were cross-checked against primary sources as of August 26, 2026.
- Fast-changing: Promotions, caps, and insurance wording can change quickly; always confirm before applying.
- What we looked at: Fees, rates, reward mechanics, redemption constraints, and common exclusions.
- Refresh cadence: Reviewed and updated as of August 26, 2026.
Disclosure
Some pages may include affiliate relationships. This does not affect the way we explain terms, risks, or comparisons.
Sources (numbered footnotes)
Trust & methodology
Score breakdown
Overall: 51/100
| Category | Weight | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Rewards | 30% | 65/100 |
| Welcome bonus | 25% | 0/100 |
| Annual fee | 20% | 100/100 |
| FX fee | 10% | 25/100 |
| Perks & insurance | 10% | 60/100 |
| Approval & eligibility | 5% | 60/100 |
Scores are a comparison aid. The “best” card depends on how you spend, whether you carry a balance, and what you value (cashback vs travel, insurance vs simplicity).
How we calculate this score
Each card gets sub-scores from 0–100 for annual fee, rewards, welcome bonus, perks/insurance, eligibility, and FX fee. The overall score is a weighted average of those sub-scores (weights below). Sub-scores are capped to avoid outliers dominating the total.
- Rewards: 30%
- Welcome bonus: 25%
- Annual fee: 20%
- FX fee: 10%
- Perks & insurance: 10%
- Approval & eligibility: 5%
This is a consumer-oriented scoring model. It is not financial advice and does not replace reading the issuer’s disclosure documents.


